Renault Grand Scenic 2009 vs Ford Galaxy 2010
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.6 Petrol | 1.6 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 110 HP | 160 HP | |
| Torque: | 151 NM | 240 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12 seconds | 9.9 seconds | |
|
Ford Galaxy is a more dynamic driving. Renault Grand Scenic engine produces 50 HP less power than Ford Galaxy, whereas torque is 89 NM less than Ford Galaxy. Due to the lower power, Renault Grand Scenic reaches 100 km/h speed 2.1 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.5 | 7.2 | |
| Renault Grand Scenic consumes 0.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Ford Galaxy, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Renault Grand Scenic could require 45 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 70 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 800 km in combined cycle | 970 km in combined cycle | |
| 980 km on highway | 1200 km on highway | ||
| Ford Galaxy gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 420'000 km | 330'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Renault Grand Scenic engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 26 years | 4 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 7 other car models, including Renault Laguna, Renault Scenic, Renault Clio, Dacia Duster | Used also on Ford S-Max | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Renault Grand Scenic might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Renault Grand Scenic 2009 1.6 engine: The engine is very robust and long-lived, up to half a million kilometres, and can suffer minor damage, but overall it is quite reliable. Fuel consumption is relatively high for these engines, but they are not ... More about Renault Grand Scenic 2009 1.6 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.56 m | 4.82 m | |
| Width: | 1.85 m | 1.88 m | |
| Height: | 1.65 m | 1.76 m | |
|
Renault Grand Scenic is smaller. Renault Grand Scenic is 26 cm shorter than the Ford Galaxy, 4 cm narrower, while the height of Renault Grand Scenic is 12 cm lower. | |||
| Seats: | 7 seats | no data | |
| Trunk capacity: | 208 litres | 390 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 7 seats: | 208 litres | no data | |
| Trunk capacity with 5 seats: | no data | 390 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
2063 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.3 meters | 11.9 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Renault Grand Scenic is 0.6 metres less than that of the Ford Galaxy, which means Renault Grand Scenic can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`067 | 2`460 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | low | |
| Average price (€): | 3400 | 10 000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Renault Grand Scenic has
|
Ford Galaxy has
| |