Renault Grand Scenic 2009 vs Volkswagen Sharan 2000
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.5 Diesel | 1.9 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 110 HP | 115 HP | |
| Torque: | 240 NM | 310 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.5 seconds | 13.7 seconds | |
| Renault Grand Scenic engine produces 5 HP less power than Volkswagen Sharan, whereas torque is 70 NM less than Volkswagen Sharan. Despite less power, Renault Grand Scenic reaches 100 km/h speed 1.2 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.2 | 6.3 | |
|
The Renault Grand Scenic is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Renault Grand Scenic consumes 1.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Sharan, which means that by driving the Renault Grand Scenic over 15,000 km in a year you can save 165 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 70 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1150 km in combined cycle | 1110 km in combined cycle | |
| 1330 km on highway | 1340 km on highway | ||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.56 m | 4.63 m | |
| Width: | 1.85 m | 1.81 m | |
| Height: | 1.65 m | 1.73 m | |
| Renault Grand Scenic is 7 cm shorter than the Volkswagen Sharan, 4 cm wider, while the height of Renault Grand Scenic is 9 cm lower. | |||
| Seats: | 7 seats | no data | |
| Trunk capacity: | 208 litres | no data | |
| Trunk capacity with 7 seats: | 208 litres | no data | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
2063 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.3 meters | 10.9 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Renault Grand Scenic is 0.4 metres more than that of the Volkswagen Sharan, which means Renault Grand Scenic can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`121 | 2`000 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | low | |
| Average price (€): | 3800 | 2600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Renault Grand Scenic has
|
Volkswagen Sharan has
| |