Renault Grand Scenic 2009 vs Mazda 5 2008

 
Renault Grand Scenic
2009 - 2012
Mazda 5
2008 - 2010
Gearbox: ManualManual
Engine: 1.5 Diesel1.8 Petrol

Performance

Power: 110 HP115 HP
Torque: 240 NM165 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 12.5 seconds11.3 seconds
Mazda 5 is a more dynamic driving.
Renault Grand Scenic engine produces 5 HP less power than Mazda 5, but torque is 75 NM more than Mazda 5. Due to the lower power, Renault Grand Scenic reaches 100 km/h speed 1.2 seconds later.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 5.27.6
The Renault Grand Scenic is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
Renault Grand Scenic consumes 2.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mazda 5, which means that by driving the Renault Grand Scenic over 15,000 km in a year you can save 360 litres of fuel.
Fuel tank capacity: 60 litres60 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 1150 km in combined cycle780 km in combined cycle
1330 km on highway980 km on highway
Renault Grand Scenic gets more mileage on one fuel tank.
Ground clearance: 120 mm (4.7 inches)140 mm (5.5 inches)
Because of the higher ground clearance, Mazda 5 can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. Note, however, that this Mazda 5 version does not have 4x4 drive, which is very important in poor road conditions.

Dimensions

Length: 4.56 m4.51 m
Width: 1.85 m1.76 m
Height: 1.65 m1.67 m
Renault Grand Scenic is larger, but slightly lower.
Renault Grand Scenic is 6 cm longer than the Mazda 5, 9 cm wider, while the height of Renault Grand Scenic is 2 cm lower.
Seats: 7 seats7 seats
Trunk capacity: 208 litres115 litres
Trunk capacity with 7 seats: 208 litres115 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
2063 litres1678 litres
In 7-seat version Renault Grand Scenic has more luggage space (by 93 litres). The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Renault Grand Scenic (by 385 litres).
Turning diameter: 11.3 meters10.6 meters
The turning circle of the Renault Grand Scenic is 0.7 metres more than that of the Mazda 5, which means Renault Grand Scenic can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Gross weight (kg): 2`1212`110
Safety: no datano data
Quality: no data
below average
Average price (€): 40003400
Pros and Cons: Renault Grand Scenic has
  • lower fuel consumption
  • more full fuel tank mileage
Mazda 5 has
  • more dynamic
  • higher ground clearance
  • better manoeuvrability
  • lower price
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv