Renault Grand Scenic 2009 vs Mazda 5 2010
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.5 Diesel | 1.6 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 110 HP | 115 HP | |
| Torque: | 240 NM | 270 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.5 seconds | 13.7 seconds | |
| Renault Grand Scenic engine produces 5 HP less power than Mazda 5, whereas torque is 30 NM less than Mazda 5. Despite less power, Renault Grand Scenic reaches 100 km/h speed 1.2 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.2 | 5.2 | |
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1150 km in combined cycle | 1150 km in combined cycle | |
| 1330 km on highway | 1300 km on highway | ||
| Ground clearance: | 120 mm (4.7 inches) | 130 mm (5.1 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Mazda 5 can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. Note, however, that this Mazda 5 version does not have 4x4 drive, which is very important in poor road conditions. | |||
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 8 years | 11 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 22 other car models, including Nissan Qashqai, Renault Laguna, Renault Scenic, Dacia Duster, Nissan Juke | Used also on Mazda 3 | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | no | yes | |
| The Mazda 5 engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.56 m | 4.59 m | |
| Width: | 1.85 m | 1.75 m | |
| Height: | 1.65 m | 1.62 m | |
| Renault Grand Scenic is 3 cm shorter than the Mazda 5, 10 cm wider, while the height of Renault Grand Scenic is 3 cm higher. | |||
| Seats: | 7 seats | 7 seats | |
| Trunk capacity: | 208 litres | 112 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 7 seats: | 208 litres | 112 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
2063 litres | 1485 litres | |
| In 7-seat version Renault Grand Scenic has more luggage space (by 96 litres). The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Renault Grand Scenic (by 578 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.3 meters | 10.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Renault Grand Scenic is 0.7 metres more than that of the Mazda 5, which means Renault Grand Scenic can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`121 | 2`125 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | average | |
| Average price (€): | 4000 | 5200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Renault Grand Scenic has
|
Mazda 5 has
| |