Renault Grand Scenic 2009 vs Chevrolet Orlando 2011
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.5 Diesel | 1.8 Petrol | |
| Diesel (Renault Grand Scenic) engines typically outperform gasoline engines in terms of fuel efficiency and low-end torque. This makes them more economical and better suited for towing or long-distance travel. However, gasoline (Chevrolet Orlando) engines mostly are lighter, quieter, and offer better acceleration and responsiveness, especially in smaller vehicles. For more information, see the article "Diesel or Petrol: Fuel Economy and Key Differences." | |||
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 110 HP | 141 HP | |
| Torque: | 240 NM | 176 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.5 seconds | 11.6 seconds | |
|
Chevrolet Orlando is a more dynamic driving. Renault Grand Scenic engine produces 31 HP less power than Chevrolet Orlando, but torque is 64 NM more than Chevrolet Orlando. Due to the lower power, Renault Grand Scenic reaches 100 km/h speed 0.9 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.2 | 7.3 | |
|
The Renault Grand Scenic is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Renault Grand Scenic consumes 2.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Chevrolet Orlando, which means that by driving the Renault Grand Scenic over 15,000 km in a year you can save 315 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 64 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1150 km in combined cycle | 870 km in combined cycle | |
| 1330 km on highway | 1080 km on highway | ||
| Renault Grand Scenic gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 8 years | 8 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 22 other car models, including Nissan Qashqai, Renault Laguna, Renault Scenic, Dacia Duster, Nissan Juke | Used also on Chevrolet Cruze | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Renault Grand Scenic might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Renault Grand Scenic 2009 1.5 engine: The engine has many modifications, is sufficiently common and spare parts are available. The fuel consumption/power ratio is good. The fuel injection system can be a problem and the timing belt change interval ... More about Renault Grand Scenic 2009 1.5 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.56 m | 4.65 m | |
| Width: | 1.85 m | 1.88 m | |
| Height: | 1.65 m | 1.63 m | |
|
Renault Grand Scenic is smaller, but slightly higher. Renault Grand Scenic is 9 cm shorter than the Chevrolet Orlando, 3 cm narrower, while the height of Renault Grand Scenic is 1 cm higher. | |||
| Seats: | 7 seats | 7 seats | |
| Trunk capacity: | 208 litres | 458 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 7 seats: | 208 litres | 458 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
2063 litres | 458 litres | |
| In 7-seat version Chevrolet Orlando has more luggage space (by 250 litres). The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Renault Grand Scenic (by 1605 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.3 meters | 11.3 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`121 | 2`160 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 2800 | 4600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Renault Grand Scenic has
|
Chevrolet Orlando has
| |