Renault Grand Scenic 2012 vs Volkswagen Touran 2010
Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 2.0 Diesel | |
Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 140 HP | 140 HP | |
Torque: | 195 NM | 320 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.8 seconds | 9.9 seconds | |
Volkswagen Touran is a more dynamic driving. Renault Grand Scenic and Volkswagen Touran have the same engine power, but Renault Grand Scenic torque is 125 NM less than Volkswagen Touran. Renault Grand Scenic reaches 100 km/h speed 0.9 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.1 | 5.7 | |
The Volkswagen Touran is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Renault Grand Scenic consumes 2.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Touran, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Renault Grand Scenic could require 360 litres more fuel. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 60 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 740 km in combined cycle | 1050 km in combined cycle | |
920 km on highway | 1200 km on highway | ||
Volkswagen Touran gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Engines | |||
Engine production duration: | 15 years | 8 years | |
Engine spread: | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Renault Laguna, Renault Megane | Installed on at least 12 other car models, including Volkswagen Passat, Volkswagen Golf, Volkswagen Sharan, Audi A3 | |
In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
Volkswagen Touran 2010 2.0 engine: The engine is very durable and can last a long time with proper maintenance, and is also quite economical for its power. There may be some problems with the turbine geometry. It is important to use good ... More about Volkswagen Touran 2010 2.0 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.57 m | 4.40 m | |
Width: | 1.85 m | 1.79 m | |
Height: | 1.65 m | 1.67 m | |
Renault Grand Scenic is larger, but slightly lower. Renault Grand Scenic is 18 cm longer than the Volkswagen Touran, 5 cm wider, while the height of Renault Grand Scenic is 3 cm lower. | |||
Seats: | 7 seats | 5 seats | |
Trunk capacity: | 645 litres | 695 litres | |
Trunk capacity with 7 seats: | 645 litres | 121 litres | |
Trunk capacity with 5 seats: | no data | 695 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
2063 litres | 1989 litres | |
In 7-seat version Renault Grand Scenic has more luggage space (by 524 litres). The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Renault Grand Scenic (by 74 litres). | |||
Turning diameter: | 11.3 meters | 11.2 meters | |
The turning circle of the Renault Grand Scenic is 0.1 metres more than that of the Volkswagen Touran. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | 2`203 | 2`220 | |
Safety: | no data | ||
Quality: | no data | average | |
Average price (€): | 4600 | 6400 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Renault Grand Scenic has
|
Volkswagen Touran has
| |