Renault Grand Scenic 2012 vs Citroen C4 Picasso 2013
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 1.6 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing chain | |
| Timing belt usually needs to be replaced more often than the chain, but it is usually significantly cheaper. Timing belt motors are generally quieter and less vibrating than chain motors. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 140 HP | 120 HP | |
| Torque: | 195 NM | 160 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.8 seconds | 12.3 seconds | |
|
Renault Grand Scenic is more dynamic to drive. Renault Grand Scenic engine produces 20 HP more power than Citroen C4 Picasso, whereas torque is 35 NM more than Citroen C4 Picasso. Thanks to more power Renault Grand Scenic reaches 100 km/h speed 1.5 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.1 | 6.3 | |
|
The Citroen C4 Picasso is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Renault Grand Scenic consumes 1.8 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Citroen C4 Picasso, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Renault Grand Scenic could require 270 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 57 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 740 km in combined cycle | 900 km in combined cycle | |
| 920 km on highway | 1160 km on highway | ||
| Citroen C4 Picasso gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 15 years | 7 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Renault Laguna, Renault Megane | Installed on at least 11 other car models, including Peugeot 308, Peugeot 207, Citroen C5, Peugeot 3008 | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.57 m | 4.43 m | |
| Width: | 1.85 m | 1.83 m | |
| Height: | 1.65 m | 1.61 m | |
|
Renault Grand Scenic is larger. Renault Grand Scenic is 15 cm longer than the Citroen C4 Picasso, 2 cm wider, while the height of Renault Grand Scenic is 4 cm higher. | |||
| Seats: | 7 seats | no data | |
| Trunk capacity: | 645 litres | 537 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 7 seats: | 645 litres | no data | |
| Trunk capacity with 5 seats: | no data | 537 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
2063 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.3 meters | 10.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Renault Grand Scenic is 0.5 metres more than that of the Citroen C4 Picasso, which means Renault Grand Scenic can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`203 | 1`900 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | low | |
| Average price (€): | 4600 | 10 800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Renault Grand Scenic has
|
Citroen C4 Picasso has
| |