Renault Grand Scenic 2012 vs Citroen C4 Picasso 2013
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.5 Diesel | 1.6 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 110 HP | 112 HP | |
| Torque: | 240 NM | 270 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 13.6 seconds | 12.3 seconds | |
|
Citroen C4 Picasso is a more dynamic driving. Renault Grand Scenic engine produces 2 HP less power than Citroen C4 Picasso, whereas torque is 30 NM less than Citroen C4 Picasso. Due to the lower power, Renault Grand Scenic reaches 100 km/h speed 1.3 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.7 | 4.0 | |
|
The Citroen C4 Picasso is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Renault Grand Scenic consumes 0.7 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Citroen C4 Picasso, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Renault Grand Scenic could require 105 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 55 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1270 km in combined cycle | 1370 km in combined cycle | |
| 1390 km on highway | 1440 km on highway | ||
| Citroen C4 Picasso gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 8 years | 8 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 22 other car models, including Nissan Qashqai, Renault Laguna, Renault Scenic, Dacia Duster, Nissan Juke | Installed on at least 13 other car models, including Peugeot 308, Citroen C3, Peugeot 207, Citroen C5 | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Renault Grand Scenic might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | no | yes | |
| The Citroen C4 Picasso engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.57 m | 4.43 m | |
| Width: | 1.85 m | 1.83 m | |
| Height: | 1.65 m | 1.61 m | |
|
Renault Grand Scenic is larger. Renault Grand Scenic is 15 cm longer than the Citroen C4 Picasso, 2 cm wider, while the height of Renault Grand Scenic is 4 cm higher. | |||
| Seats: | 7 seats | no data | |
| Trunk capacity: | 645 litres | 537 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 7 seats: | 645 litres | no data | |
| Trunk capacity with 5 seats: | no data | 537 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
2063 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.3 meters | 10.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Renault Grand Scenic is 0.5 metres more than that of the Citroen C4 Picasso, which means Renault Grand Scenic can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`230 | 1`940 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | low | |
| Average price (€): | 4400 | 13 400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Renault Grand Scenic has
|
Citroen C4 Picasso has
| |