Renault Grand Scenic 2012 vs Opel Combo 2012
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.5 Diesel | 1.6 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 110 HP | 105 HP | |
| Torque: | 260 NM | 290 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.8 seconds | 13.4 seconds | |
|
Renault Grand Scenic is more dynamic to drive. Renault Grand Scenic engine produces 5 HP more power than Opel Combo, but torque is 30 NM less than Opel Combo. Thanks to more power Renault Grand Scenic reaches 100 km/h speed 0.6 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.1 | 5.2 | |
|
The Renault Grand Scenic is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Renault Grand Scenic consumes 1.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Opel Combo, which means that by driving the Renault Grand Scenic over 15,000 km in a year you can save 165 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1460 km in combined cycle | 1150 km in combined cycle | |
| 1530 km on highway | 1270 km on highway | ||
| Renault Grand Scenic gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 8 years | 10 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 22 other car models, including Nissan Qashqai, Renault Laguna, Renault Scenic, Dacia Duster, Nissan Juke | Used also on Fiat Bravo | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Renault Grand Scenic might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | no | yes | |
| The Opel Combo engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
| Renault Grand Scenic 2012 1.5 engine: The engine has many modifications, is sufficiently common and spare parts are available. The fuel consumption/power ratio is good. The fuel injection system can be a problem and the timing belt change interval ... More about Renault Grand Scenic 2012 1.5 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.57 m | 4.39 m | |
| Width: | 1.85 m | 1.83 m | |
| Height: | 1.65 m | 1.85 m | |
|
Renault Grand Scenic is larger, but lower. Renault Grand Scenic is 18 cm longer than the Opel Combo, 1 cm wider, while the height of Renault Grand Scenic is 20 cm lower. | |||
| Seats: | 7 seats | 5 seats | |
| Trunk capacity: | 645 litres | 790 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 7 seats: | 645 litres | no data | |
| Trunk capacity with 5 seats: | no data | 790 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
2063 litres | 3200 litres | |
| The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Opel Combo (by 1137 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.3 meters | 11.2 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Renault Grand Scenic is 0.1 metres more than that of the Opel Combo. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`200 | 2`010 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 4600 | 4600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Renault Grand Scenic has
|
| |