Renault Grand Scenic 2012 vs Mazda 5 2010
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.5 Diesel | 1.6 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 110 HP | 115 HP | |
| Torque: | 260 NM | 270 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.8 seconds | 13.7 seconds | |
| Renault Grand Scenic engine produces 5 HP less power than Mazda 5, whereas torque is 10 NM less than Mazda 5. Despite less power, Renault Grand Scenic reaches 100 km/h speed 0.9 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.1 | 5.2 | |
|
The Renault Grand Scenic is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Renault Grand Scenic consumes 1.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mazda 5, which means that by driving the Renault Grand Scenic over 15,000 km in a year you can save 165 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1460 km in combined cycle | 1150 km in combined cycle | |
| 1530 km on highway | 1300 km on highway | ||
| Renault Grand Scenic gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 8 years | 11 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 22 other car models, including Nissan Qashqai, Renault Laguna, Renault Scenic, Dacia Duster, Nissan Juke | Used also on Mazda 3 | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | no | yes | |
| The Mazda 5 engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
| Renault Grand Scenic 2012 1.5 engine: The engine has many modifications, is sufficiently common and spare parts are available. The fuel consumption/power ratio is good. The fuel injection system can be a problem and the timing belt change interval ... More about Renault Grand Scenic 2012 1.5 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.57 m | 4.59 m | |
| Width: | 1.85 m | 1.75 m | |
| Height: | 1.65 m | 1.62 m | |
| Renault Grand Scenic is 1 cm shorter than the Mazda 5, 10 cm wider, while the height of Renault Grand Scenic is 3 cm higher. | |||
| Seats: | 7 seats | 7 seats | |
| Trunk capacity: | 645 litres | 112 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 7 seats: | 645 litres | 112 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
2063 litres | 1485 litres | |
| In 7-seat version Renault Grand Scenic has more luggage space (by 533 litres). The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Renault Grand Scenic (by 578 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.3 meters | 10.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Renault Grand Scenic is 0.7 metres more than that of the Mazda 5, which means Renault Grand Scenic can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`200 | 2`125 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | average | |
| Average price (€): | 4600 | 5200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Renault Grand Scenic has
|
Mazda 5 has
| |