Renault Grand Scenic 2016 vs Volkswagen Sharan 2010

Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison

 
Renault Grand Scenic
2016 -
Volkswagen Sharan
2010 -
Gearbox: Manual/AutomaticManual/Automatic
Engines: 1.2 - 1.71.4 - 2.0

Performance

Power: 110 - 160 HP140 - 200 HP
Torque: 190 - 380 NM240 - 350 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 9.2 - 15.2 seconds8.3 - 10.9 seconds
Select a car version for a more accurate comparison!

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 4.0 - 6.15.5 - 8.4
Renault Grand Scenic petrol engines consumes on average 1.7 litres less fuel per 100 km than Volkswagen Sharan. On average, Renault Grand Scenic equipped with diesel engines consume 1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Sharan.
This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version!

Dimensions

Length: 4.63 m4.85 m
Width: 1.87 m1.90 m
Height: 1.66 m1.74 m
Renault Grand Scenic is smaller.
Renault Grand Scenic is 22 cm shorter than the Volkswagen Sharan, 4 cm narrower, while the height of Renault Grand Scenic is 8 cm lower.
Trunk capacity: 718 litres809 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
1901 litresno data
Volkswagen Sharan has more luggage space.
Renault Grand Scenic has 91 litres less trunk space than the Volkswagen Sharan.
Turning diameter: 11.4 meters12 meters
The turning circle of the Renault Grand Scenic is 0.6 metres less than that of the Volkswagen Sharan, which means Renault Grand Scenic can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Gross weight (kg): ~ 2`243~ 2`337
Safety: no data
Quality: no data
low
Average price (€): 13 00014 000
Pros and Cons: Renault Grand Scenic has
  • lower fuel consumption
  • better manoeuvrability
  • lower price
Volkswagen Sharan has
  • roomier boot
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv