Renault Grand Scenic 2004 vs Volkswagen Sharan 2000
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | Front wheel drive (FWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Renault Grand Scenic is available only with front wheel drive, while Volkswagen Sharan can be equipped with front wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive. | |||
| Engines: | 1.5 - 2.0 | 1.8 - 2.8 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 100 - 163 HP | 90 - 204 HP | |
| Torque: | 152 - 300 NM | 170 - 310 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.6 - 14.3 seconds | 9.9 - 17.2 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.3 - 8.6 | 6.2 - 11.9 | |
|
Renault Grand Scenic petrol engines consumes on average 2.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than Volkswagen Sharan. On average, Renault Grand Scenic equipped with diesel engines consume 1.7 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Sharan. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.49 m | 4.63 m | |
| Width: | 1.81 m | 1.81 m | |
| Height: | 1.64 m | 1.73 m | |
| Renault Grand Scenic is 14 cm shorter than the Volkswagen Sharan, width is practically the same , while the height of Renault Grand Scenic is 9 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 513 litres | 256 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
2015 litres | no data | |
|
Renault Grand Scenic has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, Renault Grand Scenic has 257 litres more trunk space than the Volkswagen Sharan. The Volkswagen Sharan may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.7 meters | 11.9 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Renault Grand Scenic is 1.2 metres less than that of the Volkswagen Sharan, which means Renault Grand Scenic can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 2`178 | ~ 1`954 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | low | |
| Average price (€): | 1600 | 2200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Renault Grand Scenic has
|
Volkswagen Sharan has
| |