Renault Grand Scenic 2004 vs Ford Galaxy 2000
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 1.5 - 2.0 | 1.9 - 2.8 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 100 - 163 HP | 90 - 204 HP | |
| Torque: | 152 - 300 NM | 170 - 310 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.6 - 14.3 seconds | 9.9 - 17.2 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.3 - 8.6 | 6.2 - 11.9 | |
|
Renault Grand Scenic petrol engines consumes on average 2.7 litres less fuel per 100 km than Ford Galaxy. On average, Renault Grand Scenic equipped with diesel engines consume 1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Ford Galaxy. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.49 m | 4.64 m | |
| Width: | 1.81 m | 1.81 m | |
| Height: | 1.64 m | 1.73 m | |
| Renault Grand Scenic is 15 cm shorter than the Ford Galaxy, width is practically the same , while the height of Renault Grand Scenic is 9 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 513 litres | no data | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
2015 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.7 meters | 11.1 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Renault Grand Scenic is 0.4 metres less than that of the Ford Galaxy, which means Renault Grand Scenic can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 2`178 | ~ 1`933 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | low | |
| Average price (€): | 1600 | 1200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Renault Grand Scenic has
|
Ford Galaxy has
| |