Renault Grand Scenic 2006 vs Ford S-Max 2006
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
---|---|---|---|
Engines: | 1.5 - 2.0 | 1.8 - 2.5 | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 105 - 165 HP | 100 - 220 HP | |
Torque: | 152 - 340 NM | 190 - 400 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.6 - 12.9 seconds | 7.9 - 11.9 seconds | |
Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.4 - 8.6 | 6.2 - 9.7 | |
Renault Grand Scenic petrol engines consumes on average 1 litres less fuel per 100 km than Ford S-Max. On average, Renault Grand Scenic equipped with diesel engines consume 0.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Ford S-Max. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.50 m | 4.77 m | |
Width: | 1.81 m | 1.85 m | |
Height: | 1.64 m | 1.66 m | |
Renault Grand Scenic is smaller. Renault Grand Scenic is 27 cm shorter than the Ford S-Max, 4 cm narrower, while the height of Renault Grand Scenic is 2 cm lower. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 533 litres | 854 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1960 litres | 2100 litres | |
Ford S-Max has more luggage space. Renault Grand Scenic has 321 litres less trunk space than the Ford S-Max. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Ford S-Max (by 140 litres). | |||
Turning diameter: | 10.7 meters | 11.6 meters | |
The turning circle of the Renault Grand Scenic is 0.9 metres less than that of the Ford S-Max, which means Renault Grand Scenic can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | ~ 2`176 | ~ 2`433 | |
Safety: | no data | ||
Quality: | no data | average | |
Average price (€): | 2000 | 3600 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Renault Grand Scenic has
|
Ford S-Max has
| |