Renault Grand Scenic 2006 vs Ford S-Max 2006

Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison

 
Renault Grand Scenic
2006 - 2009
Ford S-Max
2006 - 2010
Gearbox: Manual/AutomaticManual/Automatic
Engines: 1.5 - 2.01.8 - 2.5

Performance

Power: 105 - 165 HP100 - 220 HP
Torque: 152 - 340 NM190 - 400 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 9.6 - 12.9 seconds7.9 - 11.9 seconds
Select a car version for a more accurate comparison!

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 5.4 - 8.66.2 - 9.7
Renault Grand Scenic petrol engines consumes on average 1 litres less fuel per 100 km than Ford S-Max. On average, Renault Grand Scenic equipped with diesel engines consume 0.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Ford S-Max.
This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version!

Dimensions

Length: 4.50 m4.77 m
Width: 1.81 m1.85 m
Height: 1.64 m1.66 m
Renault Grand Scenic is smaller.
Renault Grand Scenic is 27 cm shorter than the Ford S-Max, 4 cm narrower, while the height of Renault Grand Scenic is 2 cm lower.
Trunk capacity: 533 litres854 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
1960 litres2100 litres
Ford S-Max has more luggage space.
Renault Grand Scenic has 321 litres less trunk space than the Ford S-Max. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Ford S-Max (by 140 litres).
Turning diameter: 10.7 meters11.6 meters
The turning circle of the Renault Grand Scenic is 0.9 metres less than that of the Ford S-Max, which means Renault Grand Scenic can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Gross weight (kg): ~ 2`176~ 2`433
Safety: no data
Quality: no data
average
Average price (€): 20004000
Pros and Cons: Renault Grand Scenic has
  • lower fuel consumption
  • better manoeuvrability
  • lower price
Ford S-Max has
  • roomier boot
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv