Renault Grand Scenic 2006 vs Citroen C4 Picasso 2007
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 1.5 - 2.0 | 1.6 - 2.0 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 105 - 165 HP | 110 - 143 HP | |
| Torque: | 152 - 340 NM | 170 - 270 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.6 - 12.9 seconds | 12.1 - 14.4 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.4 - 8.6 | 5.7 - 8.9 | |
|
Renault Grand Scenic petrol engines consumes on average 0.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than Citroen C4 Picasso. On average, Renault Grand Scenic equipped with diesel engines consume 0.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Citroen C4 Picasso. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.50 m | 4.47 m | |
| Width: | 1.81 m | 1.83 m | |
| Height: | 1.64 m | 1.68 m | |
| Renault Grand Scenic is 3 cm longer than the Citroen C4 Picasso, 2 cm narrower, while the height of Renault Grand Scenic is 4 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 533 litres | 500 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1960 litres | no data | |
|
Renault Grand Scenic has more luggage capacity. Renault Grand Scenic has 33 litres more trunk space than the Citroen C4 Picasso. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.7 meters | 11.3 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Renault Grand Scenic is 0.6 metres less than that of the Citroen C4 Picasso, which means Renault Grand Scenic can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 2`176 | ~ 1`426 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | below average | |
| Average price (€): | 2000 | 2400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Renault Grand Scenic has
|
| |