Renault Grand Scenic 2009 vs Ford Galaxy 2010
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 1.4 - 2.0 | 1.6 - 2.2 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 110 - 160 HP | 115 - 203 HP | |
| Torque: | 151 - 380 NM | 185 - 420 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.3 - 12.5 seconds | 8.8 - 13.4 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.2 - 7.7 | 5.7 - 8.2 | |
|
Renault Grand Scenic petrol engines consumes on average 0.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than Ford Galaxy. On average, Renault Grand Scenic equipped with diesel engines consume 0.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Ford Galaxy. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.56 m | 4.82 m | |
| Width: | 1.85 m | 1.88 m | |
| Height: | 1.65 m | 1.76 m | |
|
Renault Grand Scenic is smaller. Renault Grand Scenic is 26 cm shorter than the Ford Galaxy, 4 cm narrower, while the height of Renault Grand Scenic is 11 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 208 litres | 390 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
2063 litres | no data | |
|
Ford Galaxy has more luggage space. Renault Grand Scenic has 182 litres less trunk space than the Ford Galaxy. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.3 meters | 11.9 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Renault Grand Scenic is 0.6 metres less than that of the Ford Galaxy, which means Renault Grand Scenic can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 2`136 | ~ 2`486 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | low | |
| Average price (€): | 4000 | 10 400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Renault Grand Scenic has
|
Ford Galaxy has
| |