Renault Grand Scenic 2012 vs Mitsubishi Outlander 2012
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Body: | Minivan / MPV | Crossover / SUV | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Crossovers and SUVs have better off-road capabilities (higher ground clearance, can have 4x4 drive), they are preferable for driving on unpaved roads and rural areas. Also, the driver's seating position is higher in a crossover or SUVs, which provides better visibility also in city. This usually comes at the cost of higher fuel consumption, increased weight and higher maintenance costs. | |||
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | Front wheel drive (FWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Renault Grand Scenic is available only with front wheel drive, while Mitsubishi Outlander can be equipped with front wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive. | |||
| Engines: | 1.2 - 2.0 (petrol, diesel) | 2.0 - 3.0 (petrol, diesel, hybrid) | |
| Both cars are available with petrol and diesel engines. Mitsubishi Outlander is available also with hybrid engines. Hybrid engines offer superior fuel efficiency and reduced emissions compared to conventional engine types. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 110 - 140 HP | 121 - 230 HP | |
| Torque: | 151 - 320 NM | 190 - 380 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.5 - 13.6 seconds | 8.7 - 12 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.1 - 8.1 | 1.9 - 8.9 | |
|
Renault Grand Scenic petrol engines consumes on average 0.7 litres less fuel per 100 km than Mitsubishi Outlander. On average, Renault Grand Scenic equipped with diesel engines consume 1.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi Outlander. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.57 m | 4.66 m | |
| Width: | 1.85 m | 1.80 m | |
| Height: | 1.65 m | 1.68 m | |
| Renault Grand Scenic is 8 cm shorter than the Mitsubishi Outlander, 5 cm wider, while the height of Renault Grand Scenic is 4 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 645 litres | 771 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
2063 litres | 1792 litres | |
| Renault Grand Scenic has 126 litres less trunk space than the Mitsubishi Outlander. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Renault Grand Scenic (by 271 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.3 meters | 10.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Renault Grand Scenic is 0.7 metres more than that of the Mitsubishi Outlander, which means Renault Grand Scenic can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 2`197 | ~ 2`159 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | below average | |
| Average price (€): | 4400 | 8200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Renault Grand Scenic has
|
Mitsubishi Outlander has
| |