Renault Grand Scenic 2012 vs Citroen C4 Picasso 2013
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 1.2 - 2.0 | 1.6 - 2.0 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 110 - 140 HP | 92 - 156 HP | |
| Torque: | 151 - 320 NM | 160 - 340 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.5 - 13.6 seconds | 9 - 13.7 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.1 - 8.1 | 3.8 - 6.3 | |
|
Renault Grand Scenic petrol engines consumes on average 1.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than Citroen C4 Picasso. On average, Renault Grand Scenic equipped with diesel engines consume 0.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Citroen C4 Picasso. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.57 m | 4.43 m | |
| Width: | 1.85 m | 1.83 m | |
| Height: | 1.65 m | 1.61 m | |
|
Renault Grand Scenic is larger. Renault Grand Scenic is 14 cm longer than the Citroen C4 Picasso, 2 cm wider, while the height of Renault Grand Scenic is 4 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 645 litres | 537 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
2063 litres | no data | |
|
Renault Grand Scenic has more luggage capacity. Renault Grand Scenic has 108 litres more trunk space than the Citroen C4 Picasso. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.3 meters | 10.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Renault Grand Scenic is 0.5 metres more than that of the Citroen C4 Picasso, which means Renault Grand Scenic can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 2`197 | ~ 1`932 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | low | |
| Average price (€): | 4800 | 13 400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Renault Grand Scenic has
|
Citroen C4 Picasso has
| |