Renault Grand Espace 2002 vs Mazda 5 2006
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.9 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 120 HP | 110 HP | |
| Torque: | 270 NM | 310 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 13.2 seconds | 12.9 seconds | |
|
Mazda 5 is a more dynamic driving. Renault Grand Espace engine produces 10 HP more power than Mazda 5, but torque is 40 NM less than Mazda 5. Despite the higher power, Renault Grand Espace reaches 100 km/h speed 0.3 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.0 | 6.3 | |
|
The Mazda 5 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Renault Grand Espace consumes 0.7 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mazda 5, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Renault Grand Espace could require 105 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 83 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1180 km in combined cycle | 950 km in combined cycle | |
| 1380 km on highway | 1050 km on highway | ||
| Renault Grand Espace gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Ground clearance: | 120 mm (4.7 inches) | 140 mm (5.5 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Mazda 5 can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. Note, however, that this Mazda 5 version does not have 4x4 drive, which is very important in poor road conditions. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 420'000 km | 390'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 8 years | 5 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 11 other car models, including Volvo V40, Renault Laguna, Renault Scenic, Volvo S40, Mitsubishi Carisma | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Mazda 6, Mazda 3 | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Renault Grand Espace might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Renault Grand Espace 2002 1.9 engine: Long-lasting and fuel-efficient engine. Maintaining oil change and maintenance intervals is essential for a long engine life, as poor or untimely oil changes can result in turbine and oil pump damage, followed ... More about Renault Grand Espace 2002 1.9 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.86 m | 4.50 m | |
| Width: | 1.86 m | 1.76 m | |
| Height: | 1.75 m | 1.66 m | |
|
Renault Grand Espace is larger. Renault Grand Espace is 36 cm longer than the Mazda 5, 10 cm wider, while the height of Renault Grand Espace is 9 cm higher. | |||
| Seats: | 7 seats | 7 seats | |
| Trunk capacity: | 456 litres | 112 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 7 seats: | 456 litres | 112 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
3050 litres | 1566 litres | |
| In 7-seat version Renault Grand Espace has more luggage space (by 344 litres). The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Renault Grand Espace (by 1484 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.4 meters | 10.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Renault Grand Espace is 0.8 metres more than that of the Mazda 5, which means Renault Grand Espace can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Power steering: | Hydraulic power steering | Electric power steering | |
| Hydraulic power steering is technologically more complex, louder, increases fuel consumption and requires more servicing. It has the advantages of more power, less strain on the car's electrical system and better feedback (feeling) when steering. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`510 | 2`225 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | average | |
| Average price (€): | 1800 | 1400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Renault Grand Espace has
|
Mazda 5 has
| |