Renault Grand Espace 2006 vs Chrysler Voyager 2004
| Gearbox: | Manual | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 2.8 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing belt | |
| Engine chain usually needs to be replaced less often than the timing belt, but the cost of replacing the chain is usually higher. Chain motors are considered to be more reliable, but noisier and more vibration generating. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 150 HP | 149 HP | |
| Torque: | 340 NM | 360 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.6 seconds | n/a seconds | |
| Renault Grand Espace engine produces 1 HP more power than Chrysler Voyager, but torque is 20 NM less than Chrysler Voyager. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.6 | 8.4 | |
|
The Renault Grand Espace is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Renault Grand Espace consumes 0.8 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Chrysler Voyager, which means that by driving the Renault Grand Espace over 15,000 km in a year you can save 120 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 75 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 780 km in combined cycle | 890 km in combined cycle | |
| 900 km on highway | 1130 km on highway | ||
| Chrysler Voyager gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 14 years | 7 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 10 other car models, including Nissan X-Trail, Nissan Qashqai, Renault Laguna, Renault Scenic, Opel Vivaro | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Chrysler Grand Voyager, Jeep Cherokee | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Renault Grand Espace might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Renault Grand Espace 2006 2.0 engine: The engine has a good power to fuel consumption ratio and, with careful maintenance, a long service life. The most common problems with these engines are with the fuel injection system and lubrication. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.86 m | 4.81 m | |
| Width: | 1.86 m | 2.00 m | |
| Height: | 1.75 m | 1.75 m | |
| Renault Grand Espace is 5 cm longer than the Chrysler Voyager, 14 cm narrower the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Seats: | 7 seats | no data | |
| Trunk capacity: | 456 litres | no data | |
| Trunk capacity with 7 seats: | 456 litres | no data | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
3050 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.4 meters | 11.5 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Renault Grand Espace is 0.1 metres less than that of the Chrysler Voyager. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`665 | 1`600 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | low | |
| Average price (€): | 3200 | 1800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Renault Grand Espace has
|
Chrysler Voyager has
| |