Renault Grand Espace 2006 vs Chrysler Grand Voyager 2004
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 2.5 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 150 HP | 140 HP | |
| Torque: | 340 NM | 312 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.6 seconds | 11.9 seconds | |
|
Renault Grand Espace is more dynamic to drive. Renault Grand Espace engine produces 10 HP more power than Chrysler Grand Voyager, whereas torque is 28 NM more than Chrysler Grand Voyager. Thanks to more power Renault Grand Espace reaches 100 km/h speed 1.3 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.6 | 7.8 | |
| Renault Grand Espace consumes 0.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Chrysler Grand Voyager, which means that by driving the Renault Grand Espace over 15,000 km in a year you can save 30 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 75 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 780 km in combined cycle | 960 km in combined cycle | |
| 900 km on highway | 1150 km on highway | ||
| Chrysler Grand Voyager gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Renault Grand Espace 2006 2.0 engine: The engine has a good power to fuel consumption ratio and, with careful maintenance, a long service life. The most common problems with these engines are with the fuel injection system and lubrication. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.86 m | 5.10 m | |
| Width: | 1.86 m | 2.00 m | |
| Height: | 1.75 m | 1.75 m | |
|
Renault Grand Espace is smaller. Renault Grand Espace is 24 cm shorter than the Chrysler Grand Voyager, 14 cm narrower the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Seats: | 7 seats | no data | |
| Trunk capacity: | 456 litres | 920 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 7 seats: | 456 litres | no data | |
| Trunk capacity with 5 seats: | no data | 920 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
3050 litres | 4130 litres | |
| The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Chrysler Grand Voyager (by 1080 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.4 meters | 12 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Renault Grand Espace is 0.6 metres less than that of the Chrysler Grand Voyager, which means Renault Grand Espace can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`665 | 2`600 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 3200 | 1600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Renault Grand Espace has
|
Chrysler Grand Voyager has
| |