Renault Grand Espace 2006 vs Chrysler Grand Voyager 2004
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 2.4 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 170 HP | 147 HP | |
| Torque: | 270 NM | 218 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.7 seconds | 12.4 seconds | |
|
Renault Grand Espace is more dynamic to drive. Renault Grand Espace engine produces 23 HP more power than Chrysler Grand Voyager, whereas torque is 52 NM more than Chrysler Grand Voyager. Thanks to more power Renault Grand Espace reaches 100 km/h speed 2.7 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.6 | 10.1 | |
|
The Renault Grand Espace is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Renault Grand Espace consumes 0.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Chrysler Grand Voyager, which means that by driving the Renault Grand Espace over 15,000 km in a year you can save 75 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 75 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 620 km in combined cycle | 740 km in combined cycle | |
| 760 km on highway | 920 km on highway | ||
| Chrysler Grand Voyager gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 15 years | 15 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 6 other car models, including Renault Laguna, Renault Scenic, Renault Megane | Installed on at least 7 other car models, including Chrysler Voyager, Jeep Cherokee, Dodge Grand Caravan | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Chrysler Grand Voyager might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Renault Grand Espace 2006 2.0 engine: This engine offers a respectable lifespan for a turbocharged motor but comes with several recurring issues that demand attention. One common problem is oil consumption, which can result from hardened valve seals or, in later ... More about Renault Grand Espace 2006 2.0 engine Chrysler Grand Voyager 2004 2.4 engine: This engine features a thin-walled cast-iron cylinder block, an aluminum cylinder head with dual overhead camshafts, a timing belt system, two balance shafts, hydraulic lifters, a dual-mass flywheel, and a dampened crankshaft pulley. It has received numerous ... More about Chrysler Grand Voyager 2004 2.4 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.86 m | 5.10 m | |
| Width: | 1.86 m | 2.00 m | |
| Height: | 1.75 m | 1.75 m | |
|
Renault Grand Espace is smaller. Renault Grand Espace is 24 cm shorter than the Chrysler Grand Voyager, 14 cm narrower the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Seats: | 7 seats | no data | |
| Trunk capacity: | 456 litres | 920 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 7 seats: | 456 litres | no data | |
| Trunk capacity with 5 seats: | no data | 920 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
3050 litres | 4130 litres | |
| The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Chrysler Grand Voyager (by 1080 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.4 meters | 12 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Renault Grand Espace is 0.6 metres less than that of the Chrysler Grand Voyager, which means Renault Grand Espace can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`530 | 2`505 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 3200 | 1600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Renault Grand Espace has
|
Chrysler Grand Voyager has
| |