Renault Grand Espace 2006 vs Chrysler Grand Voyager 2004
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.9 Diesel | 2.4 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 120 HP | 147 HP | |
| Torque: | 270 NM | 218 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 13.2 seconds | 12.4 seconds | |
|
Chrysler Grand Voyager is a more dynamic driving. Renault Grand Espace engine produces 27 HP less power than Chrysler Grand Voyager, but torque is 52 NM more than Chrysler Grand Voyager. Due to the lower power, Renault Grand Espace reaches 100 km/h speed 0.8 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.0 | 10.1 | |
|
The Renault Grand Espace is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Renault Grand Espace consumes 3.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Chrysler Grand Voyager, which means that by driving the Renault Grand Espace over 15,000 km in a year you can save 465 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 75 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 850 km in combined cycle | 740 km in combined cycle | |
| 1010 km on highway | 920 km on highway | ||
| Renault Grand Espace gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Chrysler Grand Voyager 2004 2.4 engine: This engine features a thin-walled cast-iron cylinder block, an aluminum cylinder head with dual overhead camshafts, a timing belt system, two balance shafts, hydraulic lifters, a dual-mass flywheel, and a dampened crankshaft pulley. It has received numerous ... More about Chrysler Grand Voyager 2004 2.4 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.86 m | 5.10 m | |
| Width: | 1.86 m | 2.00 m | |
| Height: | 1.75 m | 1.75 m | |
|
Renault Grand Espace is smaller. Renault Grand Espace is 24 cm shorter than the Chrysler Grand Voyager, 14 cm narrower the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Seats: | 7 seats | no data | |
| Trunk capacity: | 456 litres | 920 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 7 seats: | 456 litres | no data | |
| Trunk capacity with 5 seats: | no data | 920 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
3050 litres | 4130 litres | |
| The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Chrysler Grand Voyager (by 1080 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.4 meters | 12 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Renault Grand Espace is 0.6 metres less than that of the Chrysler Grand Voyager, which means Renault Grand Espace can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`535 | 2`505 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 3200 | 1600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Renault Grand Espace has
|
Chrysler Grand Voyager has
| |