Renault Grand Espace 2010 vs Renault Grand Scenic 2009
| Gearbox: | Manual | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 170 HP | 140 HP | |
| Torque: | 270 NM | 195 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.7 seconds | 10.8 seconds | |
|
Renault Grand Espace is more dynamic to drive. Renault Grand Espace engine produces 30 HP more power than Renault Grand Scenic, whereas torque is 75 NM more than Renault Grand Scenic. Thanks to more power Renault Grand Espace reaches 100 km/h speed 1.1 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.8 | 7.7 | |
|
The Renault Grand Scenic is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Renault Grand Espace consumes 1.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Renault Grand Scenic, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Renault Grand Espace could require 165 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 680 km in combined cycle | 770 km in combined cycle | |
| 830 km on highway | 960 km on highway | ||
| Renault Grand Scenic gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Ground clearance: | 175 mm (6.9 inches) | 120 mm (4.7 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Renault Grand Espace can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. Note, however, that this Renault Grand Espace version does not have 4x4 drive, which is very important in poor road conditions. | |||
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 15 years | 15 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 6 other car models, including Renault Laguna, Renault Scenic, Renault Megane | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Renault Laguna, Renault Megane | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Renault Grand Espace might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Renault Grand Espace 2010 2.0 engine: This engine offers a respectable lifespan for a turbocharged motor but comes with several recurring issues that demand attention. One common problem is oil consumption, which can result from hardened valve seals or, in later ... More about Renault Grand Espace 2010 2.0 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.86 m | 4.56 m | |
| Width: | 1.86 m | 1.85 m | |
| Height: | 1.75 m | 1.65 m | |
|
Renault Grand Espace is larger. Renault Grand Espace is 30 cm longer than the Renault Grand Scenic, 2 cm wider, while the height of Renault Grand Espace is 10 cm higher. | |||
| Seats: | 7 seats | 7 seats | |
| Trunk capacity: | 456 litres | 208 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 7 seats: | 456 litres | 208 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
3050 litres | 2063 litres | |
| In 7-seat version Renault Grand Espace has more luggage space (by 248 litres). The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Renault Grand Espace (by 987 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.4 meters | 11.3 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Renault Grand Espace is 0.1 metres more than that of the Renault Grand Scenic. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`530 | 2`128 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 5800 | 3400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Renault Grand Espace has
|
Renault Grand Scenic has
| |