Renault Grand Espace 2006 vs Citroen C4 Picasso 2007
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
---|---|---|---|
Engines: | 1.9 - 3.5 | 1.6 - 2.0 | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 120 - 245 HP | 110 - 143 HP | |
Torque: | 270 - 400 NM | 170 - 270 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.1 - 13.9 seconds | 12.1 - 14.4 seconds | |
Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.0 - 12.2 | 5.7 - 8.9 | |
Renault Grand Espace petrol engines consumes on average 2.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than Citroen C4 Picasso. On average, Renault Grand Espace equipped with diesel engines consume 1.8 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Citroen C4 Picasso. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.86 m | 4.47 m | |
Width: | 1.86 m | 1.83 m | |
Height: | 1.75 m | 1.68 m | |
Renault Grand Espace is larger. Renault Grand Espace is 39 cm longer than the Citroen C4 Picasso, 3 cm wider, while the height of Renault Grand Espace is 7 cm higher. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 456 litres | 500 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
3050 litres | no data | |
Citroen C4 Picasso has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Renault Grand Espace has 44 litres less trunk space than the Citroen C4 Picasso. This could mean that the Renault Grand Espace uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
Turning diameter: | 11.4 meters | 11.3 meters | |
The turning circle of the Renault Grand Espace is 0.1 metres more than that of the Citroen C4 Picasso. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | ~ 2`606 | ~ 1`426 | |
Safety: | no data | ||
Quality: | no data | below average | |
Average price (€): | 3200 | 2200 | |
Pros and Cons: |
|
Citroen C4 Picasso has
| |