Renault Espace 1997 vs Toyota Picnic 1997
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.2 Diesel | 2.2 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 115 HP | 90 HP | |
| Torque: | 250 NM | 205 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 14.5 seconds | 13.9 seconds | |
| Renault Espace engine produces 25 HP more power than Toyota Picnic, whereas torque is 45 NM more than Toyota Picnic. Despite the higher power, Renault Espace reaches 100 km/h speed 0.6 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.0 | 7.7 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 7.9 l/100km | 7.5 l/100km | |
|
By specification Renault Espace consumes 0.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Toyota Picnic, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Renault Espace could require 45 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Renault Espace consumes 0.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Toyota Picnic. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 76 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 950 km in combined cycle | 770 km in combined cycle | |
| 1160 km on highway | 930 km on highway | ||
| 960 km with real consumption | 800 km with real consumption | ||
| Renault Espace gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.52 m | 4.53 m | |
| Width: | 1.81 m | 1.70 m | |
| Height: | 1.77 m | 1.62 m | |
| Renault Espace is 1 cm shorter than the Toyota Picnic, 11 cm wider, while the height of Renault Espace is 15 cm higher. | |||
| Seats: | 7 seats | 6 seats | |
| Trunk capacity: | 275 litres | 180 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 7 seats: | 275 litres | no data | |
| Trunk capacity with 5 seats: | no data | 180 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
2850 litres | 1840 litres | |
| The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Renault Espace (by 1010 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.4 meters | 11 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Renault Espace is 0.4 metres more than that of the Toyota Picnic, which means Renault Espace can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`510 | 2`010 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Quality: | below average | high | |
| Toyota Picnic has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Renault Espace has serious deffects in 145 percent more cases than Toyota Picnic, so Toyota Picnic quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 800 | 2200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Renault Espace has
|
Toyota Picnic has
| |