Renault Espace 1999 vs Mazda Premacy 1999
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 1.8 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 140 HP | 100 HP | |
| Torque: | 188 NM | 152 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.6 seconds | 11.8 seconds | |
|
Renault Espace is more dynamic to drive. Renault Espace engine produces 40 HP more power than Mazda Premacy, whereas torque is 36 NM more than Mazda Premacy. Thanks to more power Renault Espace reaches 100 km/h speed 0.2 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.9 | 8.3 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 8.6 l/100km | 8.7 l/100km | |
|
By specification Renault Espace consumes 0.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mazda Premacy, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Renault Espace could require 90 litres more fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Renault Espace consumes 0.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mazda Premacy. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 78 litres | 58 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 870 km in combined cycle | 690 km in combined cycle | |
| 1060 km on highway | 840 km on highway | ||
| 900 km with real consumption | 660 km with real consumption | ||
| Renault Espace gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 370'000 km | 560'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Mazda Premacy engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 11 years | 7 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 4 other car models, including Renault Laguna, Renault Scenic, Renault Megane | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Mazda 626, Mazda 323 | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Renault Espace might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | yes | no | |
| The Renault Espace engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
| Renault Espace 1999 2.0 engine: The F4R 2.0 engine is a relatively simple and reliable unit, capable of lasting up to 400,000 km with proper maintenance. Its design is straightforward, and service is generally accessible. However, several recurring issues ... More about Renault Espace 1999 2.0 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.52 m | 4.30 m | |
| Width: | 1.81 m | 1.70 m | |
| Height: | 1.77 m | 1.57 m | |
|
Renault Espace is larger. Renault Espace is 22 cm longer than the Mazda Premacy, 11 cm wider, while the height of Renault Espace is 20 cm higher. | |||
| Seats: | 7 seats | 5 seats | |
| Trunk capacity: | 275 litres | 420 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 7 seats: | 275 litres | no data | |
| Trunk capacity with 5 seats: | no data | 420 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
2850 litres | 1848 litres | |
| The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Renault Espace (by 1002 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.4 meters | 10.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Renault Espace is 0.6 metres more than that of the Mazda Premacy, which means Renault Espace can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`300 | 1`760 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | below average | high | |
| Mazda Premacy has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Renault Espace has serious deffects in 35 percent more cases than Mazda Premacy, so Mazda Premacy quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 800 | 800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Renault Espace has
|
Mazda Premacy has
| |