Renault Espace 1998 vs Ford Galaxy 1995
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 115 HP | 115 HP | |
| Torque: | 168 NM | 170 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 15 seconds | 13.9 seconds | |
|
Ford Galaxy is a more dynamic driving. Renault Espace and Ford Galaxy have the same engine power, but Renault Espace torque is 2 NM less than Ford Galaxy. Renault Espace reaches 100 km/h speed 1.1 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 10.7 | 10.0 | |
|
The Ford Galaxy is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Renault Espace consumes 0.7 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Ford Galaxy, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Renault Espace could require 105 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 78 litres | 75 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 720 km in combined cycle | 750 km in combined cycle | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.52 m | 4.62 m | |
| Width: | 1.81 m | 1.80 m | |
| Height: | 1.77 m | 1.73 m | |
| Renault Espace is 10 cm shorter than the Ford Galaxy, 1 cm wider, while the height of Renault Espace is 4 cm higher. | |||
| Seats: | 7 seats | no data | |
| Trunk capacity: | 275 litres | no data | |
| Trunk capacity with 7 seats: | 275 litres | no data | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
2850 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.4 meters | 11.7 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Renault Espace is 0.3 metres less than that of the Ford Galaxy. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`300 | 1`800 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | below average | below average | |
| Renault Espace has slightly fewer faults. Deffect rate in annual technical inspection is similar for both cars, it's slightly higher for Ford Galaxy, so Renault Espace quality could be a bit better. | |||
| Average price (€): | 800 | 800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
|
Ford Galaxy has
| |