Renault Espace 2003 vs Chrysler Grand Voyager 2001
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.2 Diesel | 2.5 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 150 HP | 140 HP | |
| Torque: | 320 NM | 312 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.8 seconds | 11.9 seconds | |
| Renault Espace engine produces 10 HP more power than Chrysler Grand Voyager, whereas torque is 8 NM more than Chrysler Grand Voyager. Thanks to more power Renault Espace reaches 100 km/h speed 0.1 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.9 | 7.7 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 9.7 l/100km | 8.5 l/100km | |
|
The Chrysler Grand Voyager is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Renault Espace consumes 1.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Chrysler Grand Voyager, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Renault Espace could require 180 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Renault Espace consumes 1.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Chrysler Grand Voyager. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 83 litres | 75 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 930 km in combined cycle | 970 km in combined cycle | |
| 1130 km on highway | 1150 km on highway | ||
| 850 km with real consumption | 880 km with real consumption | ||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.66 m | 5.09 m | |
| Width: | 1.86 m | 2.00 m | |
| Height: | 1.73 m | 1.75 m | |
|
Renault Espace is smaller. Renault Espace is 43 cm shorter than the Chrysler Grand Voyager, 14 cm narrower, while the height of Renault Espace is 2 cm lower. | |||
| Seats: | 7 seats | no data | |
| Trunk capacity: | 291 litres | 920 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 7 seats: | 291 litres | no data | |
| Trunk capacity with 5 seats: | no data | 920 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
2860 litres | 4130 litres | |
| The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Chrysler Grand Voyager (by 1270 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11 meters | 12 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Renault Espace is 1 metres less than that of the Chrysler Grand Voyager, which means Renault Espace can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Power steering: | Electric power steering | Hydraulic power steering | |
| Electric power steering is simpler, quieter, more fuel-efficient, more configurable and provides additional features such as auto-steering for lane assist and parking. The disadvantages of electric power steering are possible overheating under prolonged load conditions and insufficient feedback (feeling) during steering. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`555 | 2`630 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | low | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 1600 | 1400 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 7.6/10 | 7.7/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Renault Espace has
|
Chrysler Grand Voyager has
| |