Renault Espace 2003 vs Chrysler Grand Voyager 2001
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 2.4 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 165 HP | 147 HP | |
| Torque: | 250 NM | 226 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.8 seconds | 14.1 seconds | |
|
Renault Espace is more dynamic to drive. Renault Espace engine produces 18 HP more power than Chrysler Grand Voyager, whereas torque is 24 NM more than Chrysler Grand Voyager. Thanks to more power Renault Espace reaches 100 km/h speed 3.3 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 10.5 | 12.0 | |
|
The Renault Espace is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Renault Espace consumes 1.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Chrysler Grand Voyager, which means that by driving the Renault Espace over 15,000 km in a year you can save 225 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 83 litres | 75 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 790 km in combined cycle | 620 km in combined cycle | |
| 1020 km on highway | 760 km on highway | ||
| Renault Espace gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 15 years | 15 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 6 other car models, including Renault Laguna, Renault Scenic, Renault Megane, Renault Grand Espace | Installed on at least 7 other car models, including Chrysler Voyager, Jeep Cherokee, Dodge Grand Caravan | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Chrysler Grand Voyager might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Renault Espace 2003 2.0 engine: This engine offers a respectable lifespan for a turbocharged motor but comes with several recurring issues that demand attention. One common problem is oil consumption, which can result from hardened valve seals or, in later ... More about Renault Espace 2003 2.0 engine Chrysler Grand Voyager 2001 2.4 engine: This engine features a thin-walled cast-iron cylinder block, an aluminum cylinder head with dual overhead camshafts, a timing belt system, two balance shafts, hydraulic lifters, a dual-mass flywheel, and a dampened crankshaft pulley. It has received numerous ... More about Chrysler Grand Voyager 2001 2.4 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.66 m | 5.09 m | |
| Width: | 1.86 m | 2.00 m | |
| Height: | 1.73 m | 1.75 m | |
|
Renault Espace is smaller. Renault Espace is 43 cm shorter than the Chrysler Grand Voyager, 14 cm narrower, while the height of Renault Espace is 2 cm lower. | |||
| Seats: | 7 seats | no data | |
| Trunk capacity: | 291 litres | 920 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 7 seats: | 291 litres | no data | |
| Trunk capacity with 5 seats: | no data | 920 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
2860 litres | 4130 litres | |
| The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Chrysler Grand Voyager (by 1270 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11 meters | 12 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Renault Espace is 1 metres less than that of the Chrysler Grand Voyager, which means Renault Espace can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | 2`630 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | low | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 1400 | 1200 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 7.6/10 | 7.7/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Renault Espace has
|
Chrysler Grand Voyager has
| |