Renault Espace 2002 vs Chrysler Grand Voyager 2001
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 2.4 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 140 HP | 147 HP | |
| Torque: | 191 NM | 226 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.5 seconds | 12.4 seconds | |
| Renault Espace engine produces 7 HP less power than Chrysler Grand Voyager, whereas torque is 35 NM less than Chrysler Grand Voyager. Due to the lower power, Renault Espace reaches 100 km/h speed 0.1 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.4 | 10.1 | |
|
The Renault Espace is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Renault Espace consumes 0.7 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Chrysler Grand Voyager, which means that by driving the Renault Espace over 15,000 km in a year you can save 105 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 83 litres | 75 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 880 km in combined cycle | 740 km in combined cycle | |
| 1090 km on highway | 920 km on highway | ||
| Renault Espace gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 11 years | 15 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 5 other car models, including Renault Laguna, Renault Scenic, Renault Clio, Renault Megane | Installed on at least 7 other car models, including Chrysler Voyager, Jeep Cherokee, Dodge Grand Caravan | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Chrysler Grand Voyager might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.66 m | 5.09 m | |
| Width: | 1.86 m | 2.00 m | |
| Height: | 1.73 m | 1.75 m | |
|
Renault Espace is smaller. Renault Espace is 43 cm shorter than the Chrysler Grand Voyager, 14 cm narrower, while the height of Renault Espace is 2 cm lower. | |||
| Seats: | 7 seats | no data | |
| Trunk capacity: | 291 litres | 920 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 7 seats: | 291 litres | no data | |
| Trunk capacity with 5 seats: | no data | 920 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
2860 litres | 4130 litres | |
| The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Chrysler Grand Voyager (by 1270 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11 meters | 12 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Renault Espace is 1 metres less than that of the Chrysler Grand Voyager, which means Renault Espace can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`435 | 2`630 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | low | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 1600 | 1400 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 7.6/10 | 7.7/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Renault Espace has
|
Chrysler Grand Voyager has
| |