Renault Espace 2002 vs Chrysler Grand Voyager 2001
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.9 Diesel | 2.4 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 120 HP | 147 HP | |
| Torque: | 270 NM | 226 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 13.2 seconds | 12.4 seconds | |
|
Chrysler Grand Voyager is a more dynamic driving. Renault Espace engine produces 27 HP less power than Chrysler Grand Voyager, but torque is 44 NM more than Chrysler Grand Voyager. Due to the lower power, Renault Espace reaches 100 km/h speed 0.8 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.8 | 10.1 | |
|
The Renault Espace is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Renault Espace consumes 3.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Chrysler Grand Voyager, which means that by driving the Renault Espace over 15,000 km in a year you can save 495 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 83 litres | 75 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1220 km in combined cycle | 740 km in combined cycle | |
| 1430 km on highway | 920 km on highway | ||
| Renault Espace gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 8 years | 15 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 11 other car models, including Volvo V40, Renault Laguna, Renault Scenic, Volvo S40, Mitsubishi Carisma | Installed on at least 7 other car models, including Chrysler Voyager, Jeep Cherokee, Dodge Grand Caravan | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | no | yes | |
| The Chrysler Grand Voyager engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
| Renault Espace 2002 1.9 engine: Long-lasting and fuel-efficient engine. Maintaining oil change and maintenance intervals is essential for a long engine life, as poor or untimely oil changes can result in turbine and oil pump damage, followed ... More about Renault Espace 2002 1.9 engine Chrysler Grand Voyager 2001 2.4 engine: This engine features a thin-walled cast-iron cylinder block, an aluminum cylinder head with dual overhead camshafts, a timing belt system, two balance shafts, hydraulic lifters, a dual-mass flywheel, and a dampened crankshaft pulley. It has received numerous ... More about Chrysler Grand Voyager 2001 2.4 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.66 m | 5.09 m | |
| Width: | 1.86 m | 2.00 m | |
| Height: | 1.73 m | 1.75 m | |
|
Renault Espace is smaller. Renault Espace is 43 cm shorter than the Chrysler Grand Voyager, 14 cm narrower, while the height of Renault Espace is 2 cm lower. | |||
| Seats: | 7 seats | no data | |
| Trunk capacity: | 291 litres | 920 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 7 seats: | 291 litres | no data | |
| Trunk capacity with 5 seats: | no data | 920 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
2860 litres | 4130 litres | |
| The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Chrysler Grand Voyager (by 1270 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11 meters | 12 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Renault Espace is 1 metres less than that of the Chrysler Grand Voyager, which means Renault Espace can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`505 | 2`630 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | low | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 1400 | 1200 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 7.6/10 | 7.7/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Renault Espace has
|
Chrysler Grand Voyager has
| |