Renault Espace 2010 vs Citroen C4 Picasso 2013
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain and belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 150 HP | 150 HP | |
| Torque: | 340 NM | 340 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.4 seconds | 10.4 seconds | |
| Renault Espace and Citroen C4 Picasso have the same engine power, the torque is the same for both cars. Renault Espace reaches 100 km/h speed 2 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.2 | 4.2 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 7.8 l/100km | 6.2 l/100km | |
|
The Citroen C4 Picasso is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Renault Espace consumes 3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Citroen C4 Picasso, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Renault Espace could require 450 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Renault Espace consumes 1.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Citroen C4 Picasso. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 83 litres | 55 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1150 km in combined cycle | 1300 km in combined cycle | |
| 1360 km on highway | 1440 km on highway | ||
| 1060 km with real consumption | 880 km with real consumption | ||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 14 years | 6 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 10 other car models, including Nissan X-Trail, Nissan Qashqai, Renault Laguna, Renault Scenic, Opel Vivaro | Installed on at least 4 other car models, including Peugeot 308, Peugeot 3008, Citroen C4, Peugeot 5008 | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Renault Espace might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Renault Espace 2010 2.0 engine: The engine has a good power to fuel consumption ratio and, with careful maintenance, a long service life. The most common problems with these engines are with the fuel injection system and lubrication. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.66 m | 4.43 m | |
| Width: | 1.86 m | 1.83 m | |
| Height: | 1.73 m | 1.61 m | |
|
Renault Espace is larger. Renault Espace is 23 cm longer than the Citroen C4 Picasso, 3 cm wider, while the height of Renault Espace is 12 cm higher. | |||
| Seats: | 7 seats | no data | |
| Trunk capacity: | 291 litres | 537 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 7 seats: | 291 litres | no data | |
| Trunk capacity with 5 seats: | no data | 537 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
2860 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 11 meters | 10.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Renault Espace is 0.2 metres more than that of the Citroen C4 Picasso. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`600 | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | low | low | |
| Average price (€): | 4800 | 10 800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Renault Espace has
|
Citroen C4 Picasso has
| |