Renault Espace 1999 vs Chrysler Voyager 1996
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.9 Diesel | 2.4 Petrol | |
| Diesel (Renault Espace) engines typically outperform gasoline engines in terms of fuel efficiency and low-end torque. This makes them more economical and better suited for towing or long-distance travel. However, gasoline (Chrysler Voyager) engines mostly are lighter, quieter, and offer better acceleration and responsiveness, especially in smaller vehicles. For more information, see the article "Diesel or Petrol: Fuel Economy and Key Differences." | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 98 HP | 151 HP | |
| Torque: | 200 NM | 229 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 15 seconds | 12 seconds | |
|
Chrysler Voyager is a more dynamic driving. Renault Espace engine produces 53 HP less power than Chrysler Voyager, whereas torque is 29 NM less than Chrysler Voyager. Due to the lower power, Renault Espace reaches 100 km/h speed 3 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.6 | 10.6 | |
|
The Renault Espace is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Renault Espace consumes 4 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Chrysler Voyager, which means that by driving the Renault Espace over 15,000 km in a year you can save 600 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 78 litres | 75 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1180 km in combined cycle | 700 km in combined cycle | |
| 1360 km on highway | 870 km on highway | ||
| Renault Espace gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
| Chrysler Voyager 1996 2.4 engine: This engine features a thin-walled cast-iron cylinder block, an aluminum cylinder head with dual overhead camshafts, a timing belt system, two balance shafts, hydraulic lifters, a dual-mass flywheel, and a dampened crankshaft pulley. It has received numerous ... More about Chrysler Voyager 1996 2.4 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.52 m | 4.73 m | |
| Width: | 1.81 m | 1.92 m | |
| Height: | 1.77 m | 1.74 m | |
|
Renault Espace is smaller, but slightly higher. Renault Espace is 21 cm shorter than the Chrysler Voyager, 11 cm narrower, while the height of Renault Espace is 3 cm higher. | |||
| Seats: | 7 seats | no data | |
| Trunk capacity: | 275 litres | no data | |
| Trunk capacity with 7 seats: | 275 litres | no data | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
2850 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.4 meters | 11.5 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Renault Espace is 0.1 metres less than that of the Chrysler Voyager. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`270 | 1`600 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Quality: | average | low | |
| Renault Espace has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Chrysler Voyager has serious deffects in 45 percent more cases than Renault Espace, so Renault Espace quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 800 | 800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Renault Espace has
|
Chrysler Voyager has
| |