Renault Espace 2010 vs Ford Galaxy 2010
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 2.0 | 1.6 - 2.2 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 150 - 175 HP | 115 - 203 HP | |
| Torque: | 270 - 360 NM | 185 - 420 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.7 - 12.4 seconds | 8.8 - 13.4 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.5 - 8.8 | 5.7 - 8.2 | |
|
Renault Espace petrol engines consumes on average 1 litres more fuel per 100 km than Ford Galaxy. On average, Renault Espace equipped with diesel engines consume 0.9 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Ford Galaxy. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.66 m | 4.82 m | |
| Width: | 1.86 m | 1.88 m | |
| Height: | 1.73 m | 1.76 m | |
|
Renault Espace is smaller. Renault Espace is 16 cm shorter than the Ford Galaxy, 2 cm narrower, while the height of Renault Espace is 4 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 291 litres | 390 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
2860 litres | no data | |
|
Ford Galaxy has more luggage space. Renault Espace has 99 litres less trunk space than the Ford Galaxy. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11 meters | 11.9 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Renault Espace is 0.9 metres less than that of the Ford Galaxy, which means Renault Espace can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 2`558 | ~ 2`486 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | low | low | |
| Average price (€): | 5000 | 10 400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Renault Espace has
|
Ford Galaxy has
| |