Renault Clio 2004 vs Seat Ibiza 2003
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 182 HP | 115 HP | |
| Torque: | 200 NM | 170 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 7.2 seconds | 10.1 seconds | |
|
Renault Clio is more dynamic to drive. Renault Clio engine produces 67 HP more power than Seat Ibiza, whereas torque is 30 NM more than Seat Ibiza. Thanks to more power Renault Clio reaches 100 km/h speed 2.9 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.1 | 7.7 | |
| Renault Clio consumes 0.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Seat Ibiza, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Renault Clio could require 60 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 50 litres | 45 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 610 km in combined cycle | 580 km in combined cycle | |
| 800 km on highway | 760 km on highway | ||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.81 m | 3.95 m | |
| Width: | 1.64 m | 1.70 m | |
| Height: | 1.42 m | 1.44 m | |
|
Renault Clio is smaller. Renault Clio is 14 cm shorter than the Seat Ibiza, 6 cm narrower, while the height of Renault Clio is 2 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 255 litres | 265 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1035 litres | 1030 litres | |
| Renault Clio has 10 litres less trunk space than the Seat Ibiza. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Renault Clio (by 5 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.7 meters | 10.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Renault Clio is 0.1 metres more than that of the Seat Ibiza. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`490 | 1`648 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | above average | below average | |
| Renault Clio has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Seat Ibiza has serious deffects in 15 percent more cases than Renault Clio, so Renault Clio quality is probably better | |||
| Average price (€): | 1000 | 1200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Renault Clio has
|
| |