Renault Clio 2003 vs Volkswagen Fox 2005
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.6 Petrol | 1.2 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 110 HP | 55 HP | |
| Torque: | 148 NM | 106 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.5 seconds | 18 seconds | |
|
Renault Clio is more dynamic to drive. Renault Clio engine produces 55 HP more power than Volkswagen Fox, whereas torque is 42 NM more than Volkswagen Fox. Thanks to more power Renault Clio reaches 100 km/h speed 7.5 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.4 | 6.0 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 8.7 l/100km | 6.8 l/100km | |
|
The Volkswagen Fox is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Renault Clio consumes 1.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Fox, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Renault Clio could require 210 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Renault Clio consumes 1.9 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Fox. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 50 litres | 50 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 670 km in combined cycle | 830 km in combined cycle | |
| 890 km on highway | 1000 km on highway | ||
| 570 km with real consumption | 730 km with real consumption | ||
| Volkswagen Fox gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Renault Clio 2003 1.6 engine: The engine is very robust and long-lived, up to half a million kilometres, and can suffer minor damage, but overall it is quite reliable. Fuel consumption is relatively high for these engines, but they are not ... More about Renault Clio 2003 1.6 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.81 m | 3.83 m | |
| Width: | 1.64 m | 1.66 m | |
| Height: | 1.42 m | 1.54 m | |
|
Renault Clio is smaller. Renault Clio is 2 cm shorter than the Volkswagen Fox, 2 cm narrower, while the height of Renault Clio is 12 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 255 litres | 260 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1035 litres | 1016 litres | |
| Renault Clio has 5 litres less trunk space than the Volkswagen Fox. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Renault Clio (by 19 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.7 meters | 11 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Renault Clio is 0.3 metres less than that of the Volkswagen Fox. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`515 | 1`480 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | above average | low | |
| Renault Clio has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Volkswagen Fox has serious deffects in 20 percent more cases than Renault Clio, so Renault Clio quality is probably better | |||
| Average price (€): | 1000 | 1800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Renault Clio has
|
Volkswagen Fox has
| |