Renault Clio 2003 vs Volkswagen Lupo 1999
Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 1.5 Diesel | 1.4 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 100 HP | 75 HP | |
Torque: | 200 NM | 195 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.6 seconds | 12.3 seconds | |
Renault Clio is more dynamic to drive. Renault Clio engine produces 25 HP more power than Volkswagen Lupo, whereas torque is 5 NM more than Volkswagen Lupo. Thanks to more power Renault Clio reaches 100 km/h speed 1.7 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.3 | 4.3 | |
Fuel tank capacity: | 50 litres | 34 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 1160 km in combined cycle | 790 km in combined cycle | |
1310 km on highway | 970 km on highway | ||
1020 km with real consumption | 690 km with real consumption | ||
Renault Clio gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 3.81 m | 3.53 m | |
Width: | 1.64 m | 1.64 m | |
Height: | 1.42 m | 1.46 m | |
Renault Clio is 28 cm longer than the Volkswagen Lupo, width is practically the same , while the height of Renault Clio is 4 cm lower. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 255 litres | 130 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1035 litres | 830 litres | |
Renault Clio has more luggage capacity. Renault Clio has 125 litres more trunk space than the Volkswagen Lupo. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Renault Clio (by 205 litres). | |||
Turning diameter: | 10.3 meters | 10.2 meters | |
The turning circle of the Renault Clio is 0.1 metres more than that of the Volkswagen Lupo. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | no data | 1`450 | |
Safety: | no data | ||
Quality: | low | above average | |
Volkswagen Lupo has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Renault Clio has serious deffects in 40 percent more cases than Volkswagen Lupo, so Volkswagen Lupo quality is probably significantly better | |||
Average price (€): | 1000 | 1000 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Renault Clio has
|
Volkswagen Lupo has
| |