Renault Clio 2003 vs Volkswagen Lupo 1999

 
Renault Clio
2003 - 2005
Volkswagen Lupo
1999 - 2005
Gearbox: ManualManual
Engine: 1.5 Diesel1.4 Diesel

Performance

Power: 100 HP75 HP
Torque: 200 NM195 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 10.6 seconds12.3 seconds
Renault Clio is more dynamic to drive.
Renault Clio engine produces 25 HP more power than Volkswagen Lupo, whereas torque is 5 NM more than Volkswagen Lupo. Thanks to more power Renault Clio reaches 100 km/h speed 1.7 seconds faster.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 4.34.3
Fuel tank capacity: 50 litres34 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 1160 km in combined cycle790 km in combined cycle
1310 km on highway970 km on highway
1020 km with real consumption690 km with real consumption
Renault Clio gets more mileage on one fuel tank.

Dimensions

Length: 3.81 m3.53 m
Width: 1.64 m1.64 m
Height: 1.42 m1.46 m
Renault Clio is 28 cm longer than the Volkswagen Lupo, width is practically the same , while the height of Renault Clio is 4 cm lower.
Trunk capacity: 255 litres130 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
1035 litres830 litres
Renault Clio has more luggage capacity.
Renault Clio has 125 litres more trunk space than the Volkswagen Lupo. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Renault Clio (by 205 litres).
Turning diameter: 10.3 meters10.2 meters
The turning circle of the Renault Clio is 0.1 metres more than that of the Volkswagen Lupo.
Gross weight (kg): no data1`450
Safety: no data
Quality:
low

above average
Volkswagen Lupo has fewer problems.
According to annual technical inspection data Renault Clio has serious deffects in 40 percent more cases than Volkswagen Lupo, so Volkswagen Lupo quality is probably significantly better
Average price (€): 12001200
Pros and Cons: Renault Clio has
  • more power
  • more dynamic
  • more full fuel tank mileage
  • roomier boot
  • lower price
Volkswagen Lupo has
  • fewer faults
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv