Renault Clio 2003 vs Renault Clio 2003
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.5 Diesel | 1.5 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 100 HP | 65 HP | |
| Torque: | 200 NM | 160 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.6 seconds | 15 seconds | |
|
Renault Clio 2003 is more dynamic to drive. Renault Clio 2003 engine produces 35 HP more power than Renault Clio 2003, whereas torque is 40 NM more than Renault Clio 2003. Thanks to more power Renault Clio 2003 reaches 100 km/h speed 4.4 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.3 | 4.3 | |
| Fuel tank capacity: | 50 litres | 50 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1160 km in combined cycle | 1160 km in combined cycle | |
| 1310 km on highway | 1350 km on highway | ||
| 1020 km with real consumption | 1020 km with real consumption | ||
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 4 years | 4 years | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.81 m | 3.81 m | |
| Width: | 1.64 m | 1.64 m | |
| Height: | 1.42 m | 1.42 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Renault Clio 2003 and Renault Clio 2003 are practically the same length. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 255 litres | 255 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1035 litres | 1037 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.3 meters | 10.3 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | 1`515 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | above average | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 1000 | 1000 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 5.0/10 | 5.0/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Renault Clio has
|
| |