Renault Clio 2003 vs Renault Clio 2003
Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 1.5 Diesel | 1.5 Diesel | |
Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 80 HP | 65 HP | |
Torque: | 185 NM | 160 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.2 seconds | 15 seconds | |
Renault Clio 2003 is more dynamic to drive. Renault Clio 2003 engine produces 15 HP more power than Renault Clio 2003, whereas torque is 25 NM more than Renault Clio 2003. Thanks to more power Renault Clio 2003 reaches 100 km/h speed 2.8 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.2 | 4.3 | |
Real fuel consumption: | 4.7 l/100km | 4.9 l/100km | |
By specification Renault Clio 2003 consumes 0.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Renault Clio 2003, which means that by driving the Renault Clio 2003 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 15 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Renault Clio 2003 consumes 0.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Renault Clio 2003. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 50 litres | 50 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 1190 km in combined cycle | 1160 km in combined cycle | |
1420 km on highway | 1350 km on highway | ||
1060 km with real consumption | 1020 km with real consumption | ||
Engines | |||
Engine production duration: | 4 years | 4 years | |
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 3.81 m | 3.81 m | |
Width: | 1.64 m | 1.64 m | |
Height: | 1.42 m | 1.42 m | |
Both cars are similar in size. Renault Clio 2003 and Renault Clio 2003 are practically the same length. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 255 litres | 255 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1037 litres | 1037 litres | |
Turning diameter: | 10.3 meters | 10.3 meters | |
Gross weight (kg): | 1`515 | 1`515 | |
Safety: | no data | no data | |
Quality: | above average | above average | |
Average price (€): | 1000 | 1000 | |
Rating in user reviews: | 5.0/10 | 5.0/10 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Renault Clio has
|
| |