Renault Clio 2003 vs Hyundai Getz 2005
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.5 Diesel | 1.4 Petrol | |
| Diesel (Renault Clio) engines typically outperform gasoline engines in terms of fuel efficiency and low-end torque. This makes them more economical and better suited for towing or long-distance travel. However, gasoline (Hyundai Getz) engines mostly are lighter, quieter, and offer better acceleration and responsiveness, especially in smaller vehicles. For more information, see the article "Diesel or Petrol: Fuel Economy and Key Differences." | |||
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 65 HP | 97 HP | |
| Torque: | 160 NM | 125 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 15 seconds | 11.2 seconds | |
|
Hyundai Getz is a more dynamic driving. Renault Clio engine produces 32 HP less power than Hyundai Getz, but torque is 35 NM more than Hyundai Getz. Due to the lower power, Renault Clio reaches 100 km/h speed 3.8 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.3 | 6.3 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 4.9 l/100km | 7.6 l/100km | |
|
The Renault Clio is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Renault Clio consumes 2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Hyundai Getz, which means that by driving the Renault Clio over 15,000 km in a year you can save 300 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Renault Clio consumes 2.7 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Hyundai Getz. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 50 litres | 45 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1160 km in combined cycle | 710 km in combined cycle | |
| 1350 km on highway | 860 km on highway | ||
| 1020 km with real consumption | 590 km with real consumption | ||
| Renault Clio gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 4 years | 7 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 8 other car models, including Renault Scenic, Nissan Almera, Nissan Micra, Suzuki Jimny | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Hyundai Accent, Kia RIO | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | no | yes | |
| The Hyundai Getz engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.81 m | 3.82 m | |
| Width: | 1.64 m | 1.66 m | |
| Height: | 1.42 m | 1.49 m | |
|
Renault Clio is smaller. Renault Clio is 1 cm shorter than the Hyundai Getz, 2 cm narrower, while the height of Renault Clio is 7 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 255 litres | 254 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1037 litres | 977 litres | |
| Renault Clio has 1 litres more trunk space than the Hyundai Getz. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Renault Clio (by 60 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.3 meters | 10 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Renault Clio is 0.3 metres more than that of the Hyundai Getz. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`515 | 1`510 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | above average | above average | |
| Hyundai Getz has slightly fewer faults. Deffect rate in annual technical inspection is similar for both cars, it's slightly higher for Renault Clio, so Hyundai Getz quality could be a bit better. | |||
| Average price (€): | 1000 | 1200 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 5.0/10 | 7.8/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Renault Clio has
|
Hyundai Getz has
| |