Renault Clio 2003 vs Volkswagen Lupo 2003

 
Renault Clio
2003 - 2005
Volkswagen Lupo
2003 - 2004
Gearbox: AutomaticAutomatic
Engine: 1.4 Petrol1.4 Petrol

Performance

Power: 98 HP105 HP
Torque: 127 NM130 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 12.9 seconds11.8 seconds
Volkswagen Lupo is a more dynamic driving.
Renault Clio engine produces 7 HP less power than Volkswagen Lupo, whereas torque is 3 NM less than Volkswagen Lupo. Due to the lower power, Renault Clio reaches 100 km/h speed 1.1 seconds later.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 7.34.9
The Volkswagen Lupo is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
Renault Clio consumes 2.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Lupo, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Renault Clio could require 360 litres more fuel.
Fuel tank capacity: 50 litres34 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 680 km in combined cycle690 km in combined cycle
860 km on highway820 km on highway

Dimensions

Length: 3.81 m3.53 m
Width: 1.64 m1.62 m
Height: 1.42 m1.46 m
Renault Clio is larger, but slightly lower.
Renault Clio is 28 cm longer than the Volkswagen Lupo, 2 cm wider, while the height of Renault Clio is 4 cm lower.
Trunk capacity: 255 litres130 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
1035 litresno data
Renault Clio has more luggage capacity.
Renault Clio has 125 litres more trunk space than the Volkswagen Lupo.
Turning diameter: 10.3 meters10.3 meters
Gross weight (kg): no datano data
Safety: no data
Quality:
low

above average
Volkswagen Lupo has fewer problems.
According to annual technical inspection data Renault Clio has serious deffects in 40 percent more cases than Volkswagen Lupo, so Volkswagen Lupo quality is probably significantly better
Average price (€): 10001000
Pros and Cons: Renault Clio has
  • roomier boot
  • lower price
Volkswagen Lupo has
  • more power
  • more dynamic
  • lower fuel consumption
  • fewer faults
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv