Renault Clio 2003 vs Renault Clio 2002
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.1 Petrol | 1.1 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 75 HP | 75 HP | |
| Torque: | 105 NM | 105 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 13 seconds | 13 seconds | |
| Renault Clio 2003 and Renault Clio 2002 have the same engine power, the torque is the same for both cars. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.9 | 5.9 | |
| Fuel tank capacity: | 50 litres | 50 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 840 km in combined cycle | 840 km in combined cycle | |
| 1020 km on highway | 1020 km on highway | ||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 17 years | 17 years | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.81 m | 3.81 m | |
| Width: | 1.64 m | 1.64 m | |
| Height: | 1.42 m | 1.42 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Renault Clio 2003 and Renault Clio 2002 are practically the same length. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 255 litres | 510 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1035 litres | no data | |
|
Renault Clio 2002 has more luggage space. Renault Clio 2003 has 255 litres less trunk space than the Renault Clio 2002. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.3 meters | 10.3 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | 1`500 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | low | low | |
| Average price (€): | 1000 | 1000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Renault Clio has
|
Renault Clio has
| |