Renault Clio 2003 vs Renault Clio 2001
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.1 Petrol | 1.1 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 75 HP | 60 HP | |
| Torque: | 105 NM | 93 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 13 seconds | 15 seconds | |
|
Renault Clio 2003 is more dynamic to drive. Renault Clio 2003 engine produces 15 HP more power than Renault Clio 2001, whereas torque is 12 NM more than Renault Clio 2001. Thanks to more power Renault Clio 2003 reaches 100 km/h speed 2 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.9 | 6.0 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 6.5 l/100km | 6.2 l/100km | |
|
The Renault Clio 2001 is a better choice in terms of fuel economy based on user-reported consumption, although the specification shows otherwise. By specification Renault Clio 2003 consumes 0.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Renault Clio 2001, which means that by driving the Renault Clio 2003 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 15 litres of fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Renault Clio 2003 consumes 0.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Renault Clio 2001. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 50 litres | 50 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 840 km in combined cycle | 830 km in combined cycle | |
| 1020 km on highway | 1020 km on highway | ||
| 760 km with real consumption | 800 km with real consumption | ||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 17 years | 18 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 5 other car models, including Dacia Logan, Renault Kangoo, Renault Twingo, Dacia Sandero | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Renault Kangoo, Renault Twingo | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Renault Clio 2003 might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.81 m | 3.81 m | |
| Width: | 1.64 m | 1.64 m | |
| Height: | 1.42 m | 1.42 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Renault Clio 2003 and Renault Clio 2001 are practically the same length. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 255 litres | 510 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1037 litres | no data | |
|
Renault Clio 2001 has more luggage space. Renault Clio 2003 has 255 litres less trunk space than the Renault Clio 2001. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.3 meters | 10.3 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`450 | 1`500 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | low | low | |
| Average price (€): | 1000 | 1000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Renault Clio has
|
Renault Clio has
| |