Renault Clio 2003 vs Hyundai Getz 2002
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.1 Petrol | 1.1 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 60 HP | 62 HP | |
| Torque: | 93 NM | 96 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 15 seconds | 16.1 seconds | |
| Renault Clio engine produces 2 HP less power than Hyundai Getz, whereas torque is 3 NM less than Hyundai Getz. Despite less power, Renault Clio reaches 100 km/h speed 1.1 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.0 | 5.8 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 6.2 l/100km | 6.9 l/100km | |
|
The Renault Clio is a better choice in terms of fuel economy based on user-reported consumption, although the specification shows otherwise. By specification Renault Clio consumes 0.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Hyundai Getz, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Renault Clio could require 30 litres more fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Renault Clio consumes 0.7 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Hyundai Getz. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 50 litres | 45 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 830 km in combined cycle | 770 km in combined cycle | |
| 1020 km on highway | 900 km on highway | ||
| 800 km with real consumption | 650 km with real consumption | ||
| Renault Clio gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 18 years | 12 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Renault Kangoo, Renault Twingo | Used also on Hyundai Atos | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Renault Clio might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.81 m | 3.81 m | |
| Width: | 1.64 m | 1.66 m | |
| Height: | 1.42 m | 1.49 m | |
| Renault Clio and Hyundai Getz are practically the same length. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 255 litres | 254 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1035 litres | 977 litres | |
| Renault Clio has 1 litres more trunk space than the Hyundai Getz. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Renault Clio (by 58 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.3 meters | 10 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Renault Clio is 0.3 metres more than that of the Hyundai Getz. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | 1`420 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | above average | above average | |
| Hyundai Getz has slightly fewer faults. Deffect rate in annual technical inspection is similar for both cars, it's slightly higher for Renault Clio, so Hyundai Getz quality could be a bit better. | |||
| Average price (€): | 1000 | 1000 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 5.0/10 | 8.6/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Renault Clio has
|
Hyundai Getz has
| |