Renault Clio 2003 vs Honda Jazz 2004
| Gearbox: | Manual | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.1 Petrol | 1.3 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 60 HP | 83 HP | |
| Torque: | 93 NM | 119 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 15 seconds | 14.1 seconds | |
|
Honda Jazz is a more dynamic driving. Renault Clio engine produces 23 HP less power than Honda Jazz, whereas torque is 26 NM less than Honda Jazz. Due to the lower power, Renault Clio reaches 100 km/h speed 0.9 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.0 | 5.8 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 6.2 l/100km | 7.0 l/100km | |
|
The Renault Clio is a better choice in terms of fuel economy based on user-reported consumption, although the specification shows otherwise. By specification Renault Clio consumes 0.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Honda Jazz, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Renault Clio could require 30 litres more fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Renault Clio consumes 0.8 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Honda Jazz. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 50 litres | 42 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 830 km in combined cycle | 720 km in combined cycle | |
| 1020 km on highway | 840 km on highway | ||
| 800 km with real consumption | 600 km with real consumption | ||
| Renault Clio gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.81 m | 3.84 m | |
| Width: | 1.64 m | 1.68 m | |
| Height: | 1.42 m | 1.52 m | |
|
Renault Clio is smaller. Renault Clio is 3 cm shorter than the Honda Jazz, 4 cm narrower, while the height of Renault Clio is 10 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 255 litres | 380 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1035 litres | 1323 litres | |
|
Honda Jazz has more luggage space. Renault Clio has 125 litres less trunk space than the Honda Jazz. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Honda Jazz (by 288 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.3 meters | 9.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Renault Clio is 0.5 metres more than that of the Honda Jazz, which means Renault Clio can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | 1`470 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | above average | high | |
| Honda Jazz has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Renault Clio has serious deffects in 30 percent more cases than Honda Jazz, so Honda Jazz quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 1000 | 1600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Renault Clio has
|
Honda Jazz has
| |