Renault Clio 2006 vs Hyundai Getz 2005
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 1.6 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing belt | |
| Engine chain usually needs to be replaced less often than the timing belt, but the cost of replacing the chain is usually higher. Chain motors are considered to be more reliable, but noisier and more vibration generating. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 140 HP | 106 HP | |
| Torque: | 194 NM | 144 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.5 seconds | 9.6 seconds | |
|
Renault Clio is more dynamic to drive. Renault Clio engine produces 34 HP more power than Hyundai Getz, whereas torque is 50 NM more than Hyundai Getz. Thanks to more power Renault Clio reaches 100 km/h speed 1.1 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.3 | 6.1 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 8.1 l/100km | 7.6 l/100km | |
|
The Hyundai Getz is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Renault Clio consumes 1.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Hyundai Getz, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Renault Clio could require 180 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Renault Clio consumes 0.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Hyundai Getz. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 55 litres | 45 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 750 km in combined cycle | 730 km in combined cycle | |
| 940 km on highway | 860 km on highway | ||
| 670 km with real consumption | 590 km with real consumption | ||
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 20 years | 12 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Renault Scenic, Renault Megane, Renault Koleos | Installed on at least 6 other car models, including Hyundai Elantra, Hyundai Accent, Kia RIO, Kia Cerato | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | no | yes | |
| The Hyundai Getz engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.99 m | 3.82 m | |
| Width: | 1.71 m | 1.66 m | |
| Height: | 1.49 m | 1.49 m | |
|
Renault Clio is larger. Renault Clio is 17 cm longer than the Hyundai Getz, 5 cm wider the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 288 litres | 254 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1035 litres | 977 litres | |
|
Renault Clio has more luggage capacity. Renault Clio has 34 litres more trunk space than the Hyundai Getz. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Renault Clio (by 58 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.3 meters | 10 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Renault Clio is 1.3 metres more than that of the Hyundai Getz, which means Renault Clio can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`675 | 1`530 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | low | below average | |
| Hyundai Getz has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Renault Clio has serious deffects in 10 percent more cases than Hyundai Getz, so Hyundai Getz quality is probably slightly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 1400 | 1200 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 6.1/10 | 7.8/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Renault Clio has
|
Hyundai Getz has
| |