Renault Clio 2009 vs Chevrolet Aveo 2011
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.5 Diesel | 1.2 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing chain | |
| Timing belt usually needs to be replaced more often than the chain, but it is usually significantly cheaper. Timing belt motors are generally quieter and less vibrating than chain motors. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 85 HP | 86 HP | |
| Torque: | 220 NM | 115 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.7 seconds | 13.6 seconds | |
|
Renault Clio is more dynamic to drive. Renault Clio engine produces 1 HP less power than Chevrolet Aveo, but torque is 105 NM more than Chevrolet Aveo. Despite less power, Renault Clio reaches 100 km/h speed 0.9 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.7 | 5.1 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 5.4 l/100km | 6.7 l/100km | |
|
The Renault Clio is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Renault Clio consumes 0.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Chevrolet Aveo, which means that by driving the Renault Clio over 15,000 km in a year you can save 60 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Renault Clio consumes 1.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Chevrolet Aveo. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 55 litres | 46 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1170 km in combined cycle | 900 km in combined cycle | |
| 1240 km on highway | 1060 km on highway | ||
| 1010 km with real consumption | 680 km with real consumption | ||
| Renault Clio gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 8 years | 5 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 22 other car models, including Nissan Qashqai, Renault Laguna, Renault Scenic, Dacia Duster, Nissan Juke | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Opel Corsa, Opel Adam | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Renault Clio might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | no | yes | |
| The Chevrolet Aveo engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
| Renault Clio 2009 1.5 engine: The engine has many modifications, is sufficiently common and spare parts are available. The fuel consumption/power ratio is good. The fuel injection system can be a problem and the timing belt change interval ... More about Renault Clio 2009 1.5 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.03 m | 4.04 m | |
| Width: | 1.71 m | 1.74 m | |
| Height: | 1.49 m | 1.52 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Renault Clio is 1 cm shorter than the Chevrolet Aveo, 3 cm narrower, while the height of Renault Clio is 2 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 288 litres | 290 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 653 litres | |
| Renault Clio has 2 litres less trunk space than the Chevrolet Aveo. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.7 meters | 10 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Renault Clio is 0.7 metres more than that of the Chevrolet Aveo, which means Renault Clio can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`655 | 1`535 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | low | below average | |
| Chevrolet Aveo has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Renault Clio has serious deffects in 15 percent more cases than Chevrolet Aveo, so Chevrolet Aveo quality is probably better | |||
| Average price (€): | 4000 | 3400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Renault Clio has
|
Chevrolet Aveo has
| |