Renault Clio 2009 vs Skoda Fabia 2010
Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 1.1 Petrol | 1.2 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 75 HP | 70 HP | |
Torque: | 105 NM | 112 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 13.4 seconds | 14.9 seconds | |
Renault Clio is more dynamic to drive. Renault Clio engine produces 5 HP more power than Skoda Fabia, but torque is 7 NM less than Skoda Fabia. Thanks to more power Renault Clio reaches 100 km/h speed 1.5 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.9 | 5.9 | |
Fuel tank capacity: | 55 litres | 45 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 930 km in combined cycle | 760 km in combined cycle | |
1120 km on highway | 910 km on highway | ||
840 km with real consumption | 710 km with real consumption | ||
Renault Clio gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.03 m | 4.00 m | |
Width: | 1.71 m | 1.64 m | |
Height: | 1.49 m | 1.50 m | |
Renault Clio is larger, but slightly lower. Renault Clio is 3 cm longer than the Skoda Fabia, 7 cm wider the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 288 litres | 300 litres | |
Despite its longer length, Renault Clio has 12 litres less trunk space than the Skoda Fabia. This could mean that the Renault Clio uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
Turning diameter: | 10.3 meters | 10 meters | |
The turning circle of the Renault Clio is 0.3 metres more than that of the Skoda Fabia. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | 1`570 | 1`585 | |
Safety: | no data | ||
Quality: | average | below average | |
Renault Clio has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Skoda Fabia has serious deffects in 10 percent more cases than Renault Clio, so Renault Clio quality is probably slightly better | |||
Average price (€): | 2600 | 2600 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Renault Clio has
|
| |