Renault Clio 2009 vs Toyota Aygo 2005
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.1 Petrol | 1.0 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing chain | |
| Timing belt usually needs to be replaced more often than the chain, but it is usually significantly cheaper. Timing belt motors are generally quieter and less vibrating than chain motors. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 75 HP | 68 HP | |
| Torque: | 105 NM | 93 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 13.4 seconds | 14.2 seconds | |
|
Renault Clio is more dynamic to drive. Renault Clio engine produces 7 HP more power than Toyota Aygo, whereas torque is 12 NM more than Toyota Aygo. Thanks to more power Renault Clio reaches 100 km/h speed 0.8 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.9 | 3.8 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 6.5 l/100km | 5.4 l/100km | |
|
The Toyota Aygo is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Renault Clio consumes 2.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Toyota Aygo, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Renault Clio could require 315 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Renault Clio consumes 1.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Toyota Aygo. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 55 litres | 35 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 930 km in combined cycle | 920 km in combined cycle | |
| 1120 km on highway | 1020 km on highway | ||
| 840 km with real consumption | 640 km with real consumption | ||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 17 years | 21 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 5 other car models, including Dacia Logan, Renault Kangoo, Renault Twingo, Dacia Sandero | Installed on at least 5 other car models, including Toyota Yaris, Citroen C1, Peugeot 107, Peugeot 108 | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Toyota Aygo might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Toyota Aygo 2005 1.0 engine: Engine often vibrates and has difficulty starting in cold weather. Timing chain lifetime is not very long. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.03 m | 3.41 m | |
| Width: | 1.71 m | 1.62 m | |
| Height: | 1.49 m | 1.46 m | |
|
Renault Clio is larger. Renault Clio is 62 cm longer than the Toyota Aygo, 9 cm wider, while the height of Renault Clio is 3 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 288 litres | 139 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 751 litres | |
|
Renault Clio has more luggage capacity. Renault Clio has 149 litres more trunk space than the Toyota Aygo. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.3 meters | 9.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Renault Clio is 0.9 metres more than that of the Toyota Aygo, which means Renault Clio can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`570 | 1`160 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | low | average | |
| Toyota Aygo has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Renault Clio has serious deffects in 30 percent more cases than Toyota Aygo, so Toyota Aygo quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 2800 | 1800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Renault Clio has
|
Toyota Aygo has
| |